Educ. Reso. for Part. Techn. 012Q-Rhodes
<http://www.erpt.org/012Q/rhod-00.htm>
Copyright © 2001 Martin Rhodes, Licensed to ERPT

Fluidization of Particles by Fluids, by Martin Rhodes

-- 4: Classification of Powders --


Geldart (1973) classified powders into four groups according to their fluidization properties at ambient conditions. The Geldart Classification of Powders is now used widely in all fields of powder technology.

Group A powders, when fluidized by air at ambient conditions, give a region of non-bubbling fluidization beginning at Umf , followed by bubbling fluidization as fluidizing velocity increases .

Group B powders give only bubbling fluidization under these conditions.

Geldart identified two further groups:
Group C powders - very fine, cohesive powders which are incapable of fluidization in the strict sense.

Group D powders are large particles that are distinguished by their ability to produce deep spouting beds (see Figure 5 and Video 4).


Figure 5: An image from Video 4 [11.3 min to download at 28.8kbaud]: A spouted fluidized bed of rice (Group D solids)

Figure 6 shows how the group classifications are related to the particle and gas properties.


Figure 6: Geldart's classification of powders

The fluidization properties of a powder in air may be predicted by establishing in which group it lies. It is important to note that at operating temperature and pressures above ambient a powder may appear in a different group from that which it occupies at ambient conditions. This is due to the effect of gas properties on the grouping and may have serious implications as far as the operation of the fluidized bed is concerned. Table 1 presents a summary of the typical properties of the different powder classes.

Since the range of gas velocities over which non-bubbling fluidization occurs in Group A powders is small, bubbling fluidization is the type most commonly encountered in gas-fluidized systems in commercial use. The superficial gas velocity at which bubbles first appear is known as the minimum bubbling velocity Umb. Premature bubbling can be caused by poor distributor design or protuberances inside the bed. Abrahamsen and Geldart (1980) correlated the maximum values of Umb with gas and particle properties using the following correlation:

where F is the fraction of powder less than 45 m.


In Group A powders when Umb > Umf bubbles are constantly splitting and coalescing, and a maximum stable bubble size is achieved. This makes for good quality, smooth fluidization. Figure 7 and Video 5 show bubbles in a Group A powder in a two-dimensional fluidized bed.


Figure 7: An image from Video 5 [2.4 min to download at 28.8kbaud]: Bubbles in a two-dimensional fluidized bed of Group A powder. Through splitting and coalescence, bubbles achieve a maximum stable size, effectively independent of gas velocity or vessel size.

Video 6 [3.8 min to download at 28.8kbaud]: shows the non-bubbling expansion of a fluidized bed of Group A powder as the gas velocity is gradually increased.

Video 7 [3.3 min to download at 28.8kbaud]: shows the collapse of a fluidized bed of Group A powder. When the air supply is interrupted there is a rapid drop in bed height as bubbles escape, then a slow linear decrease as the aerated powder structure collapses.


In Groups B and D powders Umb= Umf , bubbles continue to grow in size, never achieving a maximum size (see Figure 3 and Video 8). This makes for rather poor quality fluidization since there are large pressure fluctuations.
Video 8[5.6 min to download at 28.8kbaud]: shows the continual increase in size of bubbles in a two-dimensional fluidized bed of a Group B powder. Bubbles increase in size with distance from the distributor and with increasing gas velocity. Bubble size in limited only by the vessel size.
In Group C powders the interparticle forces are large compared with the inertial forces on the particles. As a result, the particles are unable to achieve the separation they require to be totally supported by drag and buoyancy forces and true fluidization does not occur. Bubbles, as such, do not appear; instead the gas flow forms channels through the powder (see Figure 8 and Video 9).


Figure 8: An image from Video 9[8.5 min to download at 28.8kbaud]: An attempt to fluidize a Group C powder produces channels or a discrete plug.

Since the particles are not fully supported by the gas, the pressure loss across the bed is always less than apparent weight of the bed per unit cross-sectional area. Consequently, measurement of bed pressure drop is ones means of detecting this Group C behaviour if visual observation is inconclusive. Fluidization of sorts, can be achieved with the assistance of a mechanical stirrer or vibration.

When the size of the bubbles is greater than about one-third of the diameter of the equipment their rise velocity is controlled by the equipment and they become slugs of gas (Videos 10 and 11).
Video 10 [10.3 min to download at 28.8kbaud]: Slugging fluidized bed
Video 11 [14.1 min to download at 28.8kbaud]: Slugging in a vertical transport line

Slugging is attended by large pressure fluctuations. and so it is generally avoided in large units since it can cause vibration to the plant. If the bed is sufficiently shallow slugging is unlikely to occur at any velocity. According to Yagi and Muchi (1952), slugging will not occur provided the criterion in Equation 15 is satisfied. This criterion works well for most powders. If the bed is deeper than this critical height then slugging will occur when the gas velocity exceeds Ums given by Equation 16 (Baeyens and Geldart, 1974).


Go to start of article | previous section | next section