Educ. Reso. for Part. Techn. 012Q-Rhodes
<http://www.erpt.org/012Q/rhod-00.htm>
Copyright © 2001 Martin Rhodes, Licensed to ERPT

Fluidization of Particles by Fluids, by Martin Rhodes

-- 6: Entrainment --


The term entrainment will be used here to describe the ejection of particles from the surface of a bubbling bed and their removal from the vessel in the fluidizing gas. In the literature on the subject other terms such as carryover, and elutriation are often used to describe the same process. In this section we will study the factors affecting the rate of entrainment of solids from a fluidized bed and develop a simple approach to the estimation of the entrainment rate and the size distribution of entrained solids.

Consider a single particle falling under gravity in a static gas in the absence of any solids boundaries. We know that this particle will reach a terminal velocity when the forces of gravity, buoyancy and drag are balanced (see Rhodes, 1998, Chapter 1). If the gas of infinite extent is now considered to be moving upwards at a velocity equal to the terminal velocity of the particle, the particle will be stationary. If the gas is moving upwards in a pipe at a superficial velocity equal to the particle's terminal velocity then:

If we now introduce into the moving gas stream a number of particles with a range of particle size some particles may fall and some may rise depending on their size and their radial position. Thus the entrainment of particles in an upward-flowing gas stream is a complex process. We can see that the rate of entrainment and the size distribution of entrained particles will in general depend on particle size and density, gas properties, gas velocity, gas flow regime - radial velocity profile and fluctuations and vessel diameter. In addition This empirical approach defines coarse particles as particles whose terminal velocity is greater than the superficial gas velocity (UT > U) and fine particles as those for which UT < U and considers the region above the fluidized bed surface to be composed of several zones shown in Figure 10:


Figure 10: Particle distribution image and rotated plot of particle density vs height showing the zones in the freeboard of a fluidized bed. Note that, although in general fine particles will be entrained and leave the system and coarse particles will remain, in practice fine particles may stay in the system at velocities several times their terminal velocity and coarse particles may be entrained. The height from the bed surface to the top of the disengagement zone is known as the transport disengagement height (TDH). Above TDH the entrainment flux and concentration of particles is constant. Thus, from the design point of view, in order to gain maximum benefit from the effect of gravity in the freeboard, the gas exit should be placed above the TDH. Many empirical correlations for TDH are available in the literature (e.g. Zenz, 1983, Horio 1980). We will use that of Horio, which is presented in Equation 37.

(dBvs = equivalent volume diameter of a bubble at the surface).

The empirical estimation of entrainment rates from fluidized beds is based on the following rather intuitive equation:

where elutriation rate constant (the entrainment flux at height h above the bed surface for the solids of size xi, when
            mBi = 1.0).
            MB = total mass of solids in the bed
            A = area of bed surface
            mBi = fraction of the bed mass with size xi at time t.

For continuous operation, mBi and MB are constant and so:

and total rate of entrainment,

The solids loading of particles of size xi in the off-gases is i = Ri / (U A) and the total solids loading leaving the freeboard is T = i.

For batch operation, the rates of entrainment of each size range, the total entrainment rate and the particle size distribution of the bed change with time. The problem can best be solved by writing Equation Eq.38 in finite increment form:

where (mBi MB) is the mass of solids in size range i entrained in time increment t.

Then total mass entrained in time

(for k size ranges) and mass of solids remaining in the bed at time

(where subscript t refers to the value at time t.) Bed composition at time

Solution to a batch entrainment problem is by sequential application of Equations 41 to 44 for the required time period.

The elutriation rate constant K*ih cannot be predicted from first principles and so it is necessary to rely on the available correlations which differ significantly in their predictions. Correlations are usually in terms of the carryover rate above TDH, . Two of the more reliable correlations are given below:

For particles > 100 m and U > 1.2 m/s Geldart et al. (1979) give

For particles < 100 m and U < 1.2 m/s Zenz and Weil (1958) give



Go to start of article | previous section | next section