Educ. Reso. for Part. Techn. 014Q-Nelson
<http://www.erpt.org/014Q/Nelsa-00.htm>
Copyright © 2001 Ralph Nelson, Licensed to ERPT

Dispersing Powders in Liquids, Part 1, by Ralph D. Nelson, Jr.

-- 7: Measuring a Particle Volume Distribution --


 

Measuring the PVD

Allen (see references) presents a comprehensive discussion of the many methods for measuring particle size. The ranges of diameter and concentration for which the major techniques are applicable are given in Table 2.1. Note that many of the methods require samples that are much more dilute than commercial slurries. This can be a serious problem, since both the liquid and the process used for diluting a high-concentration plant sample to prepare a low-concentration measurement sample may change the state of aggregation and hence the particle volume distribution.

Table 2.1 -- Size Ranges for Various Methods of Particle Size Analysis

Method                       Diameter Limits    Concentration
                             m                   volume % 
-----------------------      -------------      ----------
Wet Sieving                  20     - 1000      0.1  - 25
Light Obscuration            10     - 1000      0.01 -  1
Gravity Sedimentation         0.6   - 1000      0.01 -  3
Electric Sensing Zone         0.6   -  100      0.01 -  0.1
Laser Scattering              0.1   -  100      0.1  -  1
Laser Diffraction             0.3   -  100      0.1  -  1
Autocorrelation Spectroscopy  0.01  -   10      0.01 -  0.1
Centrifugal Sedimentation     0.01  -   10      0.1  -  3
Sedimentation Field Flow      0.005  -   1      0.1  -  1

The Agglomerate Attrition Spectrum

The energy applied to disperse the powder can be a critical element in particle size analysis. Most powders have distinctly different types and strengths of bonds between the clusters at different levels of aggregation. The weakest bonds are between the largest particles, with progressively stronger bonds as the sizes of the particles decrease. By using very small or very large energies to disperse a powder we can produce samples that appear to be made of very large or very small particles.

People requesting an analysis do not want to know how small we can grind the particles, but rather what is the distribution that characterizes the powder for their particular application. One common preparation technique is to gently stir the powder into the liquid and then place a beaker of the slurry in a weak ultrasonic field (in an ultrasonic bath) for a few minutes. This may be too harsh a treatment for weak flocs, and it may be too gentle a treatment for agglomerates

If the sample is a granulated herbicide and the question is how large the particles will be when poured out of the shipping container, the dispersion procedure should be very gentle to avoid breaking or attriting the grains during size analysis. If the sample is pigment for an automotive paint and the question is how large the particles will be after final sandmilling (the last step before the paint is sprayed), we might have to use a shear well beyond the capability of the ultrasonic bath.

The attrition spectrum is a plot of d50V and Bmid50V against the shear rate, q [s-1]. This helps visualize what happens to a clump as the shear rate increases (Neduzhil). The d50V usually drops sharply over a rather narrow range of shear rate as the bonds between particles at one level of structure are broken. In this same range the Bmid50V rises to a maximum, since the slurry is then a mixture of two different levels of agglomeration. Small changes in shear rate or time at shear will cause large changes in observed PVD if the shear rate is near a maximum in Bmid50V. If you want your dispersion procedure to be robust (insensitive to the moderate variations expected from day to day in laboratory or plant operations), you must specify a shear rate well outside the region where d50V or Bmid50V depend strongly on shear rate.

Since there is a continuum of possible shear rates, any distinction between low, medium, and high is somewhat arbitrary, but the following guidelines are useful for a low-concentration, low-viscosity slurry in a laboratory beaker:

To prepare an attrition spectrum you will need to obtain the d50V and Bmid50V values for a series of dispersions, each prepared at a different shear rate (or time at shear). Even though you may not be able to compute the absolute shear rates for the various samples in the series, useful insights can be gained with such devices as a colloid mill run with at a series of clearances between the plates, an ultrasonic probe run at a series of voltages, or a disc mill run at a series of rotational speeds.

Figure 2.4 (below) shows what the cumulative volume percent curves look like for samples of an agglomerated powder in a slurry exposed to a series of shear rates. The initial slurry mixed at low shear fo a set time gives the PVD curve at the left. This slurry is then expossed to higher shear for the same set time and analyzed again to get the next curve to the left. This is repeated for a series of ever-higher shear rates. The highest shear gives the curve at the left.


Fig. 2.4 -- PVD's for a Typical Slurry at a Series of Shear Rates: 2, 10, 20,30, and 45 s-1, highest shear gives the curve at left, with the smallest sizes.

Figure 2.5 (below) shows the attrition spectrum for this same powder. Values of d50V (line with diamonds) and Bmid50V (line with triangles) are derived from the the curves in Figure 2.4.


Fig. 2.5 -- Attrition Spectrum for a Typical Material

Since the two curves become almost horizontal in the region above 30 s-1 we can be assured that size analyses of this powder will be consistent the lab procedure is written to specify that the sample should be mixed at a shear rate of 40 s-1 for the time that was used in the attrition spectrum tests. This will break most of the agglomerates, and small variations in shear rate or time held at shear will not produce major changes in the results.


Go to start of article | previous section | next section