Educ. Reso. for Part. Techn. 014Q-Young
<http://www.erpt.org/014Q/youa-00.htm>
Copyright © 2001 Gordon Young, Licensed to ERPT

Mixing Operations, by Gordon Young

-- 1: What is mixing (or blending)? --

(see Fellows pp 118-133, Brennan pp 91-114, and Earle pp 166 - 173)
  Mixing is a unit operation in which a relatively uniform mixture is obtained from two or more components. Mixing has no preservative effect (on food) but is meant only as a processing aid, though in some cases mixing is required to promote some other objective such as mass transfer or chemical reaction.

The degree of uniformity achievable varies widely. It is easy to achieve virtually complete homogeneity when mixing miscible liquids or mixing a soluble solids into a liquid, but it can be difficult to achieve a homogeneous result when mixing two solids, mixing two highly viscous liquids, or mixing items with widely varying densities, especially if the amount of one component is very small compared to the amounts of the others.

The efficiency of mixing depends on the efficient use of energy to generate flow of the components. Important aspects in the design of a mixer include:
      -- provision of adequate input energy (for an appropriate time)
      -- design of the mechanism for introducing the energy
      -- properties of the components

How can the degree of mixing be quantified?

You would expect small samples taken from various locations in the container at the start of mixing to contain close to 100% of either one or another of the components, so a plot of composition as a function of sample location would be very uneven. As mixing proceeds, successive plots of the composition of samples taken from these same locations should become more uniform. Ideally, when mixing is complete all samples should contain the same percent of the each ingredient as the percent of that ingredient added to the vessel at the start.

What size sample should be taken?

It should be large enough so the required amount of the smallest ingredient is easily measured, yet small enough so that you are confident that the quantities normally used will contain the ingredients in the required concentration (for example, pack size or less). [See Reilly et al, 1994, Sections 1.3 and 3]

The "standard deviation", , provides a satisfactory way of quantifying the extent to which the fractional concentration of a component scatters about its mean value in the various samples. The subscript m has been added as a reminder that these measures change with the mixing time.

         

where
      xm (with an over-bar) is the mean fractional concentration
      xi = the fractional concentration of the component in the i-th sample
      n = the number of samples taken

For a perfect mix, (or 2) would equal zero. Note: 2 is called the variance of the mixture.

Many different mixing indices may be used to monitor the extent of mixing and to compare alternative types of equipment. Each one is based on measurements of standard deviations from the mean. The subscript m has been added to the indices in the equations below as a reminder that the indices change with the mixing time.

         

where
         
0 = standard deviation at the start (time = 0)
m = standard deviation at time = tm
= standard deviation of a "completely random" sample
      ( can be taken as zero for mixtures of liquids
      and for solids where the particle size is very small
      relative to the sample size)
= mean concentration of the samples
np = the number of particles in the sample
Vc = volume fraction or mass fraction of a component
          in the mixture

The first three mixing indices are described in Fellows, 2000, Section 5.1.1. M1 and M3 may be more suitable when approximately equal masses are mixed, and/or at comparatively low mixing rates. M2 is more likely to be suitable when a small amount of one component is mixed with a large amount of another, or at high mixing rates. Fellows suggests calculating all three and then using the most appropriate one (see Sample Problem 5.1 in Fellows).

M4 is a simplified index. The following table shows what values of this index are found for bad through excellent homogeneity:

Quality of Mixture                M4
Bad                                 0.70
Unsatisfactory                    0.70 to 0.80
Fairly good                       0.80 to 0.90
Good                              0.90 to 0.94
Very good                         0.94 to 0.96
Excellent:
	For granular materials    >0.96
	For fluids                >0.98

M5 is an index recommended by Reilly et al (1994) after reviewing nine different mixing indices

Whichever formulation of M you elect to use, you can compute the goal mixing index (Mgoal) from the standard deviation that would be acceptable (to your customer, for example) for samples taken from the final mixture.

How long should ingredients be mixed?

For mixing indices 1, 2, 3, and 5, the mixing index will decrease with mixing time according to the relationship

ln M = - k tm

where k is the mixing rate constant [1/s] and tm is mixing time [s].

The rate constant k can be obtained by taking and analysing samples after various mixing times, and plotting ln M vs mixing time. This should be a straight line, and its slope is -k. Once you have obtained k you can to calculate the required mixing time to get to the desired (goal) mixing index from

tgoal = - (1 / k) ln Mgoal

Earle (1983) also discusses use of a "mixing index" to examine the thoroughness of mixing and rates of mixing.


Go to start of article | next section