Educ. Reso. for Part. Techn. 024Q-Nelson
<http://www.erpt.org/024Q/Nelsb-00.htm>
Copyright © 2002 Ralph Nelson, Licensed to ERPT

Dispersing Powders in Liquids, Part 2, by Ralph D. Nelson, Jr.

-- 3: Motion in Response to External Fields --


It is difficult to observe and quantify particle-particle interactions directly, so we usually determine the values for particle parameters by measuring the motion of a large number of particles when exposed to an external force such as gravity or an electric field. This section shows how those forces are related to particle and liquid parameters. Section 4 describes how the properties of the liquid vary with composition and describes how solutes affect ionic interaction. A section in a later part of this edition will describe a number of tests which can be used to characterize a slurry.

Sedimentation

The gravitational sedimenting force fsedG [N] due to the effect of gravity g [9.81 m / s2] on a particle depends on the difference between the solid's density s [kg/m3] and the liquid's density l.

[3a]      fsedG = ( / 6) g (s - l) dp3

We can create a larger sedimentation force using the centrifugal force in a centrifuge (in which the wall rotates about an axis and the fluid is relatively static with respect to the wall) or a cyclone (in which the walls are static and the fluid moves rapidly with respect to the walls). Centrifugal acceleration is related to the radial rotation rate = 2 RRPM / 60 [rad/s], where RRPM is the number of revolutions per minute, and to the distance from the axis of centrifugation to the particle rcent [m]. The centrifugal sedimentation force is

[3b]      fsed,cent = ( / 6) 2 rcent(s - l) dp3

Not that if the liquid is more dense than the particle, the particles will rise (or move toward the axis of centrifugation) rather than sinking (or moving toward the outer wall).

Thermal Jostling

The energy transferred in a collision between a molecule of liquid and a particle varies from collision to collision. The distribution of energies among the various degrees of freedom may be described using statistical mechanics. The average value of translational energy in one dimension in an isotropic system at equilibrium is kT.

The energy distribution function (see discussion in Section 1) indicates that about 8 % of the pairs will collide with less than a quarter of the characteristic velocity (half the thermal energy) and 4 % will collide with more than four times the characteristic velocity (twice the thermal energy).

The thermal jostling due to numerous molecular impacts from the liquid moves the particle at random. This tends to break up weakly bonded flocs that have no primary minimum, but thermal jostling can cause a weakly flocculated system to form strong flocs if the height of the barrier is smaller than about 4kT. For such a low barrier, the thermal jostling can provide enough energy to push two weakly-bound particles over the barrier and close enough to fall into the primary well. A section in a later part will provide an equation relating the height of the barrier to the rate of flocculation.

Electrophoresis

When two large, opposed, parallel plates separated by splate [m] are immersed in a slurry and connected to a battery of voltage VE [V], the electric field gradient EE = VE / splate [V/m] draws particles with a surface charge density of charge [C / m2] toward the plate bearing an opposite electrical charge with a force of

      fion = dp2 charge EE

Since it is hard to measure charge, you will often find that it has been replaced by an approximate relation to the zeta potential -- the electrical potential at the shear plane (Hiemenz, pages 738-757),

[3c]      charge = 0 l Kion ( / dp)

where Kion has a value between 1.8 and 6, depending on solution conditions. The shear plane is a (non-spherical) surface surrounding a moving particle, inside of which the fluid -- and the associated ionic atmosphere based on the particles surface charge -- tends to travel with the particle and outside of which the fluid tends to remain static with respect to the bulk fluid and the ions in that fluid are more uniformly distributed. It is not feasible to compute the exact boundary of the shear plane, but we know that it will move closer to the particle at high particle velocities through the liquid. It is a useful concept, but it is not easy to quantify. Combining equations we get

[3d]      fion = 2 0 l Kion dp EE

Viscous Drag

When a particle moves through a liquid in response to the field of another particle or to an external field, many molecules of liquid must be displaced as the particle passes by. The collisional coupling between the particle and the liquid results in a drag force opposed to the direction of particle motion. The fluid flow regime (creeping, laminar, or turbulent) is related to the Reynolds number, which is the ratio of the fluid's inertia to viscous drag. For a sphere moving through a large body of liquid with density l [kg/m3] and viscosity l [Pa s],

[3e]      NRe = vp dp l / l

If the inertia of the particle is so small compared to drag that NRe is less than 1 (the usual situation in dispersions of small particles), we are in the creeping regime, and the drag force, fdrag [N], may be computed using Stokes' Law,

[3f]      fdrag = 3 l dp vp

Particle Motion and the Balance of Forces

In a gravitational field particles whose density differs from the fluid in which they are suspended will accelerate until fdrag = fsedG, after which the velocity will remain constant. If dp = 1 equilibrium is reached within a few seconds. Setting the equations (above) for fdrag and fsedG equal at the terminal sedimentation velocity vsed [m/s] we can solve for dp as

[3g]      dp = {18 l vsedG / [g (s - l)]}0.5

so the distance moved in time t [s] may be computed from

[3h]      xsedG = vsedG t = g (s - l) dp2 t / (18 l)

it is important to note that for these equations x and v are defined as being positive in the downward dirtection. This equation is a good approximation for dilute dispersions (in which the volume fraction of solids is below 0.01). I section in a later part will discuss settling at higher solids loadings.

The analysis of particle concentration during centrifugation is more complicated than the analysis of gravitational settling. In a centrifuge the particles follow radial (rather than parallel) paths, and as they move farther from the axis they experience higher centrifugal forces, making them move faster as they move outward.

In an electrical field gradient charged particles will accelerate until fdrag = fion. It is easiest to model this in zero gravity or in a case where the electrical field gradient is horizontal -- perpendicular to gravity). The electrophoretic mobility of a charged particle is the ratio of its terminal velocity vion [m/s] to the electric field gradient EE [V/m]. The ratio can be used to determine using the equation based on this balance of forces,

[3i]      = 3 l vion / ( 0 l Kion EE)

Electrophoretic motion is directed toward the charged plate, and the distance moved in time t [s] may be computed from

[3j]      xion = vion t = 0 l Kion EE t / (3 l)

In the presence of thermal jostling particles wander randomly in the liquid, an effect called thermal diffusion or Brownian motion. Using a microscope you may observe thes in a good dispersion of particles with dp 2m. The root-mean-square average distance xtherm [m] (based on many observations) that a particle will move away (in a random direction) from a position at time t = 0 in time t may be computed from

[3k]      xtherm = [i=1n (xi,t - xi,0)2 / n]0.5 = [2 Ddiff t]0.5

where Ddiff [m2/s] is the diffusion coefficient based on kinetic molecular theory. For spherical particles it is

[3l]      Ddiff = kT / (3 l dp)

Example: the Relative Magnitude of External Forces

Gravitational sedimentation dominates the motion of large particles, while thermal jostling dominates for small particles. Particle charge can dominate only in the mid-size range. Figure 3-3 shows how far a particle would travel in one second as a function of particle diameter for three driving forces:
-- thermal jostling at 298K
-- sedimentation at Earth's gravity
-- electrophoresis in an electric field gradient of 25 V/m
for a particle with s = 2,000 kg/m3 and = 0.1 V in a liquid with l = 1,000 kg/m3, l = 0.001 Pa s, and Kion = 3.


You may download and use the computer program Nelsbp01.tru, which allows you to plot the same graph with these or other parameters values
Fig. 3-1 Comparison of relative contributions to particle motion
Note that thermal energy dominates the motion at low diameters, sedimentation dominates at large diameters, while the intermediate region may be dominated by electrophoretic effects (depending on surface charge density and the ionic strength of the solution).

Consider an organic powder with s = 700 kg/m3 and dp = 2 m dispersed in water with l = 1 mPa s at T = 300K. This will have Ddiff = 2.2 10-13 s/m2. For an observation interval of t = 1 s, xRMS = 0.66 m. We can easily observe this degree of motion using a microscope and a magnification of 400. The thermal jostling would not be so obvious if the particle were 16 times larger (it would move only 1/4 as far) or if it were 9 times as dense (it would move only 1/3 as far). Although smaller particles move farther during the same time period, particles smaller than about 0.2 m are hard to see under a microscope because they scatter little light. However their motion can be measured using laser illumination and light scattering techniques.

Thermal Diffusion in a Gravitational Field

The balance between gravitational and thermal forces can be observed for small, uncharged particles if the attraction due to mutual polarizability is too small to cause flocculation. The concentration profile is most easily related to theory if all the particles have nearly the same diameter dp [m]. Make a good dispersion of the powder (with no dispersants) in liquid at a concentration Cm,ave [kg/m3] of about 10 kg/m3. Pour the dispersion into a graduated cylinder and let it stand at constant temperature without agitation. The particles will neither settle out completely nor remain evenly distributed throughout the height. They will become distributed in an equilibrium profile of concentration Cm,h [mol/m3] that decreases exponentially with height h [m] above the bottom of the container,

[3m]      Cm,h = B H Cm,ave e-Bh / (1 - e-BH)

at a rate that depends on the total distance from the bottom of the container to the surface of the liquid H [m] and on the ratio of net sedimentation force to thermal energy B [m-1],

[3n]      B = g (s - l) dp3 /(6 kT)

These same equations can be used to determine the compute the distribution of gas molecules as a function of height above a planet. The gravitational attraction for the molecules toward the planet's surface is balanced against thermal jostling in a small scale analog of the way that particulate settling is balanced against thermal jostling.

Example: Distribution of Silica Particles in a Drum

Colloidal silica can be coated with boehmite (AlOOH) so that the zeta potential and interparticle forces are zero in a slurry at pH 7. An initially well-mixed aqueous dispersion having Cave = 10 kg/m3 of such a coated silica is poured into a drum to a depth H =1 m. At T = 298K, s = 2,200 kg/m3, l = 1,000 kg/m3, and l = 1 mPa s. As the drum stands for a long time in a warehouse, sedimentation equilibrium is approached.
You may download and use the computer program Nelsbp01.tru, which allows you to plot the same graph with these or other parameters values

Fig. 3-2 Concentration profiles for various diameters of particles

Note that the distribution shifts dramatically as the particle diameter changes by a factor of 17. The vertical line at 100 indicates the initial well-mixed and evenly-distributed state. A dispersion of 3 nm particles will remain relatively well-distributed throughout the height of the drum, a dispersion of 12 nm particles shows a clear buildup toward the bottom of the container, while a dispersion of 50 nm particles settles almost completely to the bottom.


Go to start of article | last section | next section |